The Limits of Mysticism - Eckhart Tolle Meets Anthroposophy

In my experience questing for understanding of spiritualfor the majority of people today it is necessary). . .”
aspects of the human community, I have had occasionThe key to grappling with the thinking issue is to
to encounter some unusual synchronicities.  One suchunderstand the difference between thought (already
event emerged while perusing a lecture by notedperformed, now existing in the past) and the process
Initiate and spiritual scientist, Rudolf Steiner. of thinking (alive in the moment). “I think, therefore I
Steiner’s statement, pertaining to 13th Centuryam” is the  lesser ego’s line.  However, “I
mystic, Meister Eckhart, ran as follows: (to paraphrase)am” is the voice of the source of thinking.
“Eckhart mistook the seed of his next life (accruedPrior to meditation, the gaps between thoughts are
from wisdom of his then current life) for the “Godexperienced as nothing.  Through process of
within,” as he was not familiar with the dynamics ofmeditation, those gaps become the birth arena, the
reincarnation.”birth-force, of thought.
            Steiner was referring to bothNew Age demonization of the ego can be
Meister Eckhart, and his principle disciple, John Tauler. problematic.  For one thing, the development of
Cut, now, to a popular spiritual teacher of our presentego-consciousness was a necessary phase toward a
time, Eckhart Tolle.  Eight centuries ago, we hadgreater destiny.  And beyond the domain of the
Eckhart/Tauler.  Now we have Eckhart Tolle. . .“lower ego” presides another aspect of self,
hmmm. . .so I did a metaphysical double take on thiswhich can be termed “Ego,” an individualized
resonation, and decided to look deeper.aspect of Spirit  - in fact, the modern “jewel in the
One of the first things I discovered was that Eckhartlotus,” or leading edge of evolution for humanity.  In
Tolle’s keystone awakening, a life-alteringSteiner’s view, humanity is destined, eventually, to
experience at age 29, typified the kind of event foundreturn to the spiritual pool from which it emerged, only
on the path of a mystic.  As opposed to a rigorous,we will do so with fully developed consciousness.
day by day, every-step-earned process, Tolle’s            While the ancient practice of
entry was an overnight leap into the Threshold.dissolution of the ego was an effective process for its
Subsequent to his epiphany experience, the Tolle oftime, discernment of the new conditions of our current
today, nee Ulrich Leonard Tolle, changed his name toage needs to come about.
resonate with one of his key influences, the originalRelated to this consideration, is the concept of
Meister Eckhart of the 13th Century.   “separation” (as an aspect of the “ego’s
This led me to undertake a comparative analysis ofsense of identity”).  While separation is largely
what Eckhart Tolle is presenting, alongsideillusion-based, the new edge of evolution suggests that
anthroposophy.  In this article, I refer principally tobecause individuation is valid, the spiritual evolution of
modern anthroposophy, as exemplified by Georghuman nature entails a dynamic poise that strives to
Kuhlewind (who passed on in 2006), a dependableembrace both Unity and Separation  - that we are, or
resource on Western meditation and consciousnessare growing to be, both fully one with All, yet
exploration.simultaneously individuated.  This level of truth can
Compared with the wildly popular Eckhart Tolle, theonly be comprehended on a clairsentient level, as the
lesser known offerings of Kuhlewind, are (I maintain)mind itself cannot grasp this seeming impossibility  -
more grounded, and deeper-running.  Resources forimpossible on the mental plain, but feasible on the
both follow at the end of this article.spiritual plain.
However, from the outset, I want to say that this is not            The real issue, then, is not that the
meant to be a put-down of the worldview presentedego needs to be dissipated (although on one level,
by Eckhart Tolle.  In fact, my own feeling is that manymindful processing of the ego is certainly called for),
of his practices have a lot of merit.  Only, in the end,but that humanity, like a fourteen-year-old teen, is not
upon in-depth review, a seeker may want to temperyet mature enough to engage its Ego-hood.  This is
these practices with some complementarywhy we fall, so often, into such trouble with this facet
perspectives.  If I had to choose between Tolle andof our being  - into egotism, and related failings.  And
Kuhlewind, I would choose the latter. However, evenit explains, also, our association with out-dated social
better, I believe a productive synthesis of the two canidentity forums that lead to strife, division, and violence,
be pursued  - provided the seeker proceeds mindfully,such as, nationalism, inside-outside group membership,
and engages in a way that honors individualreligions, blood-family ties  - all manner of social
circumstances.groupings we need to move on from.  We have not
            As in all things, caveat emptor  -yet matured into this newest aspect of our being, an
“buyer beware”  - especially when theEgo-hood that, paradoxically, transcends division.
“purchase” is a metaphysical one.           
Some of the differences between the two pathwaysA key part of the agenda of an active processing
that I have chosen to scrutinize appear to consistrelates to transforming the ego into a higher state. 
largely of a definitional nature.  For example, inThe goal of modern meditation might be summed up
Tolle’s estimation, “thinking” is the keyas a practice that leads beyond normal thinking, into
problem, “the mind” is the enemy  - unless usedthe process of Thinking.
with Presence.  An Anthroposophical approach            It is likely that, of the millions who
agrees with this, as far as everyday conceptual lifeare engaging in the exercises that teachers such as
goes, but contends that Thinking, per se, is a powerfullyEckhart Tolle present, most will attain meaningful
productive avenue.  To clarify, the anthroposophicalprogress in terms of soul-processing.  They will free
perspective of “Thinking” refers to thinkingthemselves of some of their incarnation-bound
imbued with feeling and willing, a Steinerian form ofsuffering, but will fall short on initiating the other half of
cognition, as opposed to what Eckhart Tolle is gettingthe agenda  - that of spirit-processing.
at, which is the basic conceptual activity of the lowerSpirit-processing entails activity like consciously evolving
ego.one’s astral nature, a long-term project.  The real
Georg Kuhlewind asserts that, “Thinking mustdeal is about rigorous striving to convert the lower
become so strong and independent that it appears toastral nature to a higher form. Clearly an Egoic
the subject with the same character of reality as doesfunction.  “Presence,” in this assessment, is a
any outward perception.  This is achieved throughprocess that entails the power and engagement of the
exercises in concentration, as far as is necessary (and“I.