Should You Have to Defend Your Belief?

"If there is a God, why does he allow all the evil in theBuddhists state that karma is carried from life to life,
world?"and even if sinners are not punished in this life, they will
How often are you asked that question? And howget their comeuppance in the end.
often do you find yourself defending your faith in God?So that's moral evil explained so that it still fits in with
Should you have to? Do unbelievers constantly findour idea of an all-loving God. But what about natural
themselves called upon to justify why they don'tevil? For example, plagues, earthquakes, droughts,
believe in God?famine. Even if we can make sense of moral evil, can
Atheists argue that there is no proof that God existswe do the same with natural evil? Can man and his
and see their stance as having solid foundations. Butfree will be held responsible for this too?
does it? Is there proof that he doesn't exist? Are thereMaybe in some instances they can. But the
really stronger grounds for atheism than for theism?philosopher, Leibniz said "God created the best
Let's begin with the problem of 'Knowledge'. Nothing ispossible world." He wanted man to have the
ever 100% certain, even historical 'facts', or scientificopportunity to make the right choices, to exercise his
'facts'. After all, it used to be a scientific fact that all themoral worth, to put others first. So did God create a
planets revolved around the Earth, it being the centreworld where he knew natural disasters would happen
of the universe. So maybe some beliefs we havein order that man could prove himself? Make sacrifices
today will eventually turn out not to be 'facts'.to help or save others? Do natural disasters really go
It is very difficult to take a strong atheistic position andagainst the idea of an all-loving god?
attempt to give grounds for this. So why is it alwaysHe even intervenes 'miraculously' sometimes. So let's
believers who are called upon to prove their beliefs?very briefly look at miracles. The term generally refers
Why don't we ask the unbelievers, the doubters, toto a fortunate occurrence for which no immediate
prove that God doesn't exist?explanation is available. They are sometimes a
This was the viewpoint of the philosopher, Ayer. Hetransgression of a law of nature.
argued that the possibility of religious 'knowledge' isHowever, many people don't see miracles as proof of
ruled out. The existence of a being defined as 'God'the existence of God, because they dispute the
cannot be demonstrably proved. But he also said thatexistence of miracles. Testimonies of witnesses can
it cannot be disproved either!be inadequate or unreliable.
Let's look at the case for either side.But you don't have to believe in miracles to believe in
The first argument put up by unbelievers is usually athe existence of God. So what other grounds for
criticism of an all-loving, all-powerful God. "What aboutbelief are there?
all the disasters and suffering in the world that heOne argument centres around design. The universe is
allows to happen?" "What about little children beingordered and consistent. We can observe that all
murdered? What about rapes? The Holocaust? Mans'around us in nature. Believers argue that it couldn't
inhumanity to man. Why does God allow all the evil inhave happened by chance. There must have been a
the world?"designer, a creator for all of it. However, Darwins'
For some, this debate can be a great threat to faith.theory of evolution is believed by many to account for
So let's look at moral evil as in the examples above.the developments, order and design in the world.
The argument from atheists is usually how can aIn our three-dimensional, material world, it's very hard to
loving God permit such terrible things to happen? Godconceive of such a being as God. It can be seen as
is love. And he is all powerful. Couldn't he stop suchrational not to believe in him. We have the evidence of
evil?our senses. We can't see him or hear him, but does
Theists' answer could be that God wanted histhat mean he's not there? So what about all these
creation, man, to have free will. He didn't wantarguments for and against theism and for and against
robot-like beings. He wanted to give us the opportunityatheism? Can either position really be proved or
to make good decisions, to be able to choose or todisproved?
reject Gods' laws, to pass or fail his tests.Try this line of argument the next time your faith is
So why do men fail when we have the moral andquestioned. It's based on a quote from the philosopher,
intellectual capacity to distinguish good from evil? WhyDescartes: "God possesses all perfections, and
didn't God create beings who could resist temptations?existence is a perfection." ... Therefore he exists!
Consider this. If God is omniscient, he must haveFootnote: Definitions:
known in advance how his creatures would act, andTheism = The belief in a God who not only created
therefore must have had good reason to arrangethe universe, but takes an active part or interest in it.
matters as he did. He allows us to make our ownAtheism = Against knowledge of God.
moral choices, but like all good parents, he will punish usA strong atheistic position = Stating we KNOW God
for any wrongdoings. Jesus said "As ye sow, so shalldoesn't exist.
ye reap". The law of Karma, as in Buddhist traditions,A weak atheistic position = A BELIEF that God doesn't
makes sense of this. As believers in reincarnation,exist.